An excellent post over at the Touchline Bawler about the laudable announcement by the All England Club that they will continue to reward the men's champion with higher prize money than his female counterpart (£655k and £625k respectively). Whilst this £30k difference is virtually insignificant statistically speaking, the importance is in the message behind the difference.
TB makes a series of effective arguments, and another salient point to note is the vastly greater depth of talent in the men's game in comparison to the women's. You only need to look at the 45-minute 6-0 6-0 walkovers for the top players in the early rounds of the women's competition to see that this is the case, and the consequence is that it is exceptionally rare in the women's game for a big-name player to exit the tournament (or even have to put in much effort) in the early stages.
Contrast with the men's game, where it is not uncommon for unseeded players (i.e. outside the top 32 players) to reach the later stages and even occasionally the final, and in virtually every Grand Slam in recent memory there have been high-profile upsets and 5-set thrillers in the early rounds of the men's singles. I'd struggle to think of more than a handful of recent first-, second- and third-round matches in the women's singles at Wimbledon that have provided the remotest interest.
Purely because tennis is probably the single high-profile sport on the world stage where women have almost an equal billing with their male counterparts, I would be willing to acquiesce to equal pay so long as the women played over 5-sets in the Grand Slam tournaments – perhaps even just in the later stages – despite the fact that men would still be providing more in the way of entertainment across the whole tournament.
However for female players simply to demand equal pay based on some vague notion of gender equality without putting forward any cogent argument is effectively a call for positive discrimination, and let's face it they're not exactly living on the bread line. As for the laughable implication that equal pay at Wimbledon will somehow be the catalyst that effects some sort of gender-blind utopian society…